Next Up: Big Tech vs. Nature - Comparing Cost-Effectivities and Socio-Ecological-Economical Effects of Breadfruit Agroforestry vis-à-vis the Contenders

Our post here will delve into the next step of escalating the interlocution with the current tech-bro narrative (Big Tech vs. more natural, less artificial, less industrial techniques).

We've already collated all the relevant data and will add it here, soon, in palatable chunks.

Hint:  Breadfruit wins | By a large margin.

So what did Bill Gates & Co mean about tree planting, "science people" and "idiots"?

Dear Mr. William Henry Gates III, come again?

New BF-Vids, condensing ~20+ Pages & ~150+ References in short form

 

As always, for many more details check out our written docs,

like on this link to our 7BIO / BreadfruitGeoEngineering Feasibiliy Summary.

🙄 It's understandable that anyone would find this implausible at first - but if you really crunch the numbers and data points we provide, you'll find breadfruit may be the most practicable and cost-effective method yet envisioned - far superior to more artificial approaches, which are factually mostly unproven in practice and are known for their often disastrous ecological consequences, with far lower cost effectivities than BF. If one may think we're just angling for donations: We're not a NGO, we're practical agroforestry farmers in Ghana. We never received any donations, nor do we somehow trade carbon credits. Our farm and initiative are run partially charitably, partially for profit. Just the same as our whole project - quasi total food security and profit and environmental ameliorization, by ultimatively planting 7 billion Breadfruit trees on private land, financed just by ordinary farmers and gardeners for a profit (cash crop), complemented with tree sponsorships and official and institutional aid to provide processing facilities to this among-highest yielding of plants globally.