Next Up: Big Tech vs. Nature - Comparing Cost-Effectivities and Socio-Ecological-Economical Effects of Breadfruit Agroforestry vis-à-vis the Contenders

Our post here will delve into the next step of escalating the interlocution with the current tech-bro narrative (Big Tech vs. more natural, less artificial, less industrial techniques).

We've already collated all the relevant data and will add it here, soon, in palatable chunks.

Hint:  Breadfruit wins | By a large margin.

So what did Bill Gates & Co mean about tree planting, "science people" and "idiots"?

Dear Mr. William Henry Gates III, come again?

We have yet waited in vain for any attempted counter-argument to the many public posts, comments and responses in which we've laid out our own, as well as general scientific data. Not even one single study yet is pointing at any actual superiority of industrial methods towards either Food Security (Lab Meat has trophological conversion rates even lower than animals, and animals again 10-150-fold lower than plants) or Carbon Capture or any other relevant application.

So, what's up, y'all techies are otherwise always so outspoken amongst your peers....?


Why people such as them try to downplay tree-based solutions? Simple: There's no money in it for them - the cash-income would go instead straight to the farmers and processing facilities, while consumer prices also would drop, due to effects of scale and breadfruit's high yield.